hh introduction

Aristotle explica el concepto que la intuicion es lo que esta por debajo de todo conocimineto o entiendimiento. Que exhiste un conocimento innato que le da forma a nuestro entendimiento de lo que nos entra por nuestors sensos.

Conceptos similar nos da Carl Jung con sus acrquetipos. Jung describe: eventos acquetipo como : nacimiento, la muerte, separacion de sus padres, iniciacion, casamiento, la union de opositos, etc. O figuras architiopicas como el heroe, la madre, padre ninyo, etc O motifs arquitipico como el apocalipso, creacion etc... Arquetipos son le conocimiento que toda vida tiene, conceptos de intuicion que son commun para todos.

Todos tenemos un entiendimineto innato, tenemos una realidad interna que nos motiva. Es esta realidad , esta motivacion la qual religion utilisa para atraer nuestra participacion. Lo que es spiritual.

Iqual como toda vida, nosotros tenemos dentro de nuestra exhistencia una conectividad con el pasado que nos conecta a el futuro. Una intuicion que nos viene de el pasado y conduce nuesta vision de el presente y la abilida de predecir el futuro.

Para la majoria de nosotros vemos el pasado como algo que se fue y seprado de el presente o futuro.

Tenemos la capacidad de comprender el prcente y tambien el futuro, y podemos entender el pasado un poco... Lo que es deficil entender es que nuesta coneccion con el pasado es iqual en proporcion que la que tenemos con el futuro.

Por la misma naturalesa de nuestra conciencia podemos ver el pasado, futuro y presente. Lo que no vemos bien es lo intensamente conectado que estamos con exsitencia, el mismo pasado futuro y precente. Dentro de lo espiritual es en realidad cono functionamos en esta exhistencia. Nuestra religion o creencias espirituales son nuestras guias dentro de este mundo aparentemente phisico.

La importancia de nuestra espriritualidad no ha pasado sin nota. Por manipular creencias o eventos historicos manipulas las creencias y la realidad de personas y pueblos.

Puedes voluntariamente hacer gente, confesarse, pagar tibutos, peliar una guerra, esclavisar a el quen queras.

Podas ver lo importante que es saver la verdad. Quen somos, nuestro pasado, nuestra historia. Esta verdad es lo unico que puede aliniar nuestra intucion con conciencia y formar nuestra realidad. Es esto qual construye una mejor exhitencia para todos.

Aristotle explains the idea that Intuition is what lies beneath knowing and understanding. That there is a first knowledge that forms our understanding of what comes from the senses.

Similar concepts are brought to us by Carl Jung,s archetypes. Jung described: archetypal events: birth, death, separation from parents, initiation, marriage, the union of opposites etc., archetypal figures: mother, father, child, God. trickster, hero, wise old man etc. and archetypal motifs: the Apocalypse, the Deluge, the Creation, etc. These are common understanding we all have... a common intuition.

It is a common understanding that we do have an underling reality that motivates us .. and this is what religion employs to attract us. The spiritual.

Within each of us there is, as in all life, there is a connectivity with the past that connects us into the future. An intuition that comes from this past and dives our vision to see the present and predict a future.

For most of us we see the past as gone and separate from the now or future.

We can understand the now and future to some extent, and we can understand the past to some extent .. what is difficult to understand is that our connection with the past is equally proportionate with the future.

We by the very nature consciousness not only see the past, future and present but are intensely connected to it. In a since we are the past present and future. Our spirituality is truly how we function within this existence. That our spiritual beliefs are our only true guide it to what appears to us to be a physical world.

The importance to us of this spirituality has not gone unnoticed. By manipulating belief of historical events you manipulate the reality and spirituality of a people.

You can make people confess to you, you can make them pay you tribute, you can make them go to war for you, you can enslave them.

Can you see the importance of truth and knowledge of ourselves our past, our religion, and our history. That this knowledge is what will align us with our intuition and form our reality. This will make for a better existence for all.

n history. If you have manipulated history your benefitto the

If we look onto humanity as we do the complex mathematical models of chaos where order comes from chaotic events. Then one could assume that just as fractals, there would be a next level of intuition within us... a social intuition. Rather that our collective social existence has a nature that is similar to knowing in it. That our very existence is intentional, and that within the intention there a collective understanding.

This approach to these historical events is based on intuition. Some would say facts would be more important, and I ask you to please set any incorrect or. I would say that most of the historical facts we and have been given have been fabricated. Therefore we are left with our intuition in order to more truly understand our past. Judge the validity of the events

Does the story begin with Moses? Is this history understood if we have have little understanding of who and when was Moses. Is what is told us a simplification designed simply to govern us through our need for understanding.

Why not let the truth be your savior, allow reason, love and charity to be the motivation of existence

If we look onto humanity as we do the complex mathematical models of chaos where order comes from chaotic events. Then one could assume that just as fractals, there would be a next level of intuition within us... a social intuition. Rather that our collective social exhistance has a natuer thati si simolar to knowing in it. That our very exhistance is intentional, and that within the intention there a collective understanding.

Why not let the truth be your savior, allow reason, love and charity to be the motivation of existance

The basic story says that he did exist, that he took the Jews out of Egypt. That these twelve tribes of Abraham settled in Cainan.

FROM THE TIME ALEXANDER TAKES ISAREL THE JEWISH PEOPLE HAVE PEACE AFTER AN ENTIRE HISTORY OF WAR AND DEPORTATION FIR THE NEXT 300 YEARS THEY WORK WITHIN THE EMPIRE OF THE GREEKS AND BECOME COMPLETLY HELINISED. THEY CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE GREEKS AND WHEN THE ROMANS TAKE THE EMPIRES OF THE GREEKS THEY FEEL ONCE AGAIN IN PERIL. THE UNION OF CEASER WITH CLEOPATRA IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR A FREE PEOPLE.

THE DEATH OF CEASAR AND THEN THE DEATH OF HIS SON CEASEARIO THAT IS TO BE BOTH PHARO AND CEASER IS A DISASTER FOR WITHOUT THE INFLUENCE THEY HAVE WITH EGYPT THEY WILL ONEC AGAIN BE DISINFRANCHISED.

The term "Hellenistic Judaism" makes sense, from the time of Alexander to the time of Christ, Judaism and Canaan was Hellenistic. There are significant distinctions in the manner in which Hellenism influenced factions within the Jewish world of that time. Adoption of Greek language, dress and sciences as well as total incorporation of Greek philosophy and culture, to the point of assimilation the understanding of Judaism into a Hellenic idiom.

The birthplace of Saint Paul is Tarsus that was capital of the province of Cilicia, scene of the romance between Mark Antony and Cleopatra.
Born under the name Saul, "an Israelite of the tribe of Benjamin, circumcised on the eighth day" (Philippians 3:5). However, Paul's own letters never mention this as his birthplace, nor is the name "Saul" alluded to. Acts records that Paul was a Roman citizen — a privilege he used a number of times in his defence, appealing against convictions in Judaea to Rome (Acts 22:25 and Acts 27–28).

He described himself as a Pharisee (Philippians 3:5). He supported himself during his travels and while preaching — a fact he alludes to a number of times (e.g., 1 Cor. 9:13-15). According to Acts 18:3 he worked as a tentmaker

The use of Egypt's immense land rents to finance the Empire's operations resulted from Augustus' conquest of Egypt and the shift to a Roman form of government.[197] As it was effectively considered Augustus' private property rather than a province of the Empire, it became part of each succeeding emperor's patrimonium.[198] Instead of a legate or proconsul, Augustus installed a prefect from the equestrian class to administer Egypt and maintain its lucrative seaports; this position became the highest political achievement for any equestrian besides becoming Prefect of the Praetorian Guard.[199] The highly productive agricultural land of Egypt yielded enormous revenues that were available to Augustus and his successors to pay for public works and military expeditions,[197] as well as bread and circuses for the population of Rome.

In the Hebrew Bible, the High Priest and the king are each sometimes called "the anointed" (Leviticus 4:3-5, 4:16; 6:20; Psalm 132:10). Prophets were also anointed (1 Kings 19:16; 1 Chronicles 16:22; Psalm 105:15).

Anointing a king was equivalent to crowning him; in fact, in Israel a crown was not required (1 Samuel 16:13; 2 Samuel 2:4, etc.). Thus David was anointed as king by the prophet Samuel:

Then Samuel took the horn of oil, and anointed him in the midst of his brethren: and the Spirit of the Lord came upon David from that day forward. So Samuel rose up, and went to Ramah.—1 Samuel 16:13.

The Messiah

Distinct from the Jewish view, Christians believe the "anointed" one referred to in various biblical verses such as Psalm 2:2 and Daniel 9:25-26 is the promised Messiah. According to the Jewish Bible, whenever someone was anointed with the specific holy anointing oil formula and ceremony described in Exodus 30:22-25, the Spirit of God came upon this person, to qualify him or her for a God-given task. Understanding that Jesus was never anointed in this way, Christians take a spiritual reading of anointed, and believe that Jesus was "anointed" with the Holy Spirit directly. According to the New Testament, Jesus of Nazareth is this Anointed One, the Messiah (John 1:41; Acts 9:22; 17:2-3; 18:5, 18:28), and the Gospels state that he was physically "anointed" (although not in the fashion described in Exodus) by an anonymous figure who is interpreted by some as Mary Magdalene. The word Christ which is now used as though it were a surname is actually a title derived from the Greek Christos roughly meaning 'anointed' (creamy or greased would be more cognate as translations).

[edit] Hospitality

Anointing was also an act of hospitality, as Jesus was anointed in the house of the Pharisee (Luke 7:38-46).

The first government to have an identifiable civil religion was the Roman Empire, whose first Emperor Augustus officially attempted to revive the dutiful practice of Classical paganism. Greek and Roman religion were essentially local in character; the Roman Empire attempted to unite its disparate territories by inculcating an ideal of Roman piety, and by a syncretistic identifying of the gods of conquered territories with the Greek and Roman pantheon. In this campaign, Augustus erected monuments such as the Ara Pacis, the Altar of Peace, showing the Emperor and his family worshiping the gods. He also encouraged the publication of works such as Virgil's Æneid, which depicted "pious Æneas", the legendary ancestor of Rome, as a role model for Roman religiosity. Roman historians such as Livy told tales of early Romans as morally improving stories of military prowess and civic virtue. The Roman civil religion later became centered on the person of the Emperor through the imperial cult, the worship of the genius of the Emperor.

The phrase "civil religion" was first discussed extensively by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in The Social Contract. Rousseau defined "civil religion" as a group of religious beliefs he believed to be universal, and which he believed governments had a right to uphold and maintain: belief in a deity, belief in an afterlife in which virtue is rewarded and vice punished; and belief in religious tolerance. Beyond that, Rousseau affirmed that individuals' religious opinions should be beyond the reach of governments.

In the 1960s and 1970s, scholars such as Robert N. Bellah and Martin E. Marty studied civil religion as a cultural phenomenon, attempting to identify the actual tenets of civil religion in the United States of America, or to study civil religion as a phenomenon of cultural anthropology. Within this U.S. context, Marty wrote that Americans approved of "religion in general" without being particularly concerned about the content of that faith, and attempted to distinguish "priestly" and "prophetic" roles within the practice of American civil religion, which he preferred to call the public theology.[citation needed] In "Civil Religion in America," a 1967 essay, Bellah wrote that civil religion in its priestly sense is "an institutionalized collection of sacred beliefs about the American nation." Bellah describes the prophetic role of civil religion as challenging "national self-worship" and calling for "the subordination of the nation to ethical principles that transcend it in terms of which it should be judged."[citation needed] Bellah identified the American Revolution, the Civil War, and the Civil Rights Movement as three decisive historical events that impacted the content and imagery of civil religion in the United States.

81 As for the children of Antony, Antyllus, his son by Fulvia, was betrayed by Theodorus his tutor and put to death; and after the soldiers had cut off his head, his tutor took away the exceeding precious stone which the boy wore about his neck and sewed it into his own girdle; and though he denied the deed, he was convicted of it and crucified. 2 Cleopatra's children, together with their attendants, were kept under guard and had generous treatment. p321But Caesarion, who was said to be Cleopatra's son by Julius Caesar, was sent by his mother, with much treasure, into India, by way of Ethiopia. There Rhodon, another tutor like Theodorus, persuaded him to go back, on the ground that Caesar invited him to take the kingdom. But while Caesar was deliberating on the matter, we are told that Areius said:—

"Not a good thing were a Caesar too many."

82 As for Caesarion, then, he was afterwards put to death by Caesar,— after the death of Cleopatra; but as for Antony, though many generals and kings asked for his body that they might give it burial, Caesar would not take it away from Cleopatra, and it was buried by her hands in sumptuous and royal fashion, such things being granted her for the purpose as she desired. But in consequence of so much grief as well as pain (for her breasts were wounded and inflamed by the blows she gave them) a fever assailed her, and she welcomed it as an excuse for abstaining from food and so releasing herself from life without hindrance. 2 Moreover, there was a physician in her company of intimates, Olympus, to whom she told the truth, and she had his counsel and assistance in compassing her death, as Olympus himself testifies in a history of these events which he published. But Caesar was suspicious, and plied her with threats and fears regarding her children, by which she was laid low, as by engines of war, and surrendered her body for such care and nourishment as was desired.

I contend that the boy escaped that he whent through the very territories that Antony and Cleopatra had conquered in the previous years. That Marc Anthony (Octavious) had no choice but to say that the boy was returend and that he killed him. That her perseued a campainge into Siria in search of the traveling Ceasarion party. That early and there is no evedence of the "murder of the inossensts" , that this story reflets the murder of all young men in Egypt by Caliglula

Only a few years before Cleopatra had traveled to Tarsus to meet and marry Marc Anthony. Through the same Siria that late Octavius would campainging through after the death of Anthony and Cleopatra.

At the time of Christ the true son of god would be not only Horis which was the title of "Ptolemy Ceaser" but also the son of Julius Ceasar who also had been called God. It is my belief that the Jews had shared governing with the Greek Ptolemy Dynasty since its inception 300 years earlier. That they saw the marriage of Anthony and Cleopatra and the son they now raised of the dead Julius Ceasar as the only hope for this continued satbility of govenment in the reagion.

After all the largest Jewish population at the time was in Alexandria. A city that was equally divided between Jewish, Eqyptinan, and Pagan religious beliefs. The Jewish people themselves had become greatly Hellinised by this time. I believe that by the time of the first Jewish revolt 66AD it had been more than clear that the new administration that came from Rome was not one that favored the Jewish people.

That prior and under Julius Ceasar, Israel was allowed to be a client state under the rule of local kings. That the first orders of the new administration of Agustus (octavius) Ceaser was to remove the kings and take direct control of the state